(Video screenshot)

(Video screenshot)

In a scenario that could come only from the upside-down world of transgenderism, a school has suspended two boys who complained that a girl was allowed into their locker room.

That’s right, a girl goes into a boys locker room, and in fact violates school rules by recording the boys complaining about her presence. So the boys get suspended.

The details are in a report at RedState.

“It’s once again an election year, so let’s hope voters are paying attention. Here’s the deal. As RedState previously reported, Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) was weighing a Title IX investigation against three male students at Stone Bridge High School after they complained about a biological female student using the boys’ locker room. Not only did the girl use a locker room that doesn’t align with her biological sex, as is required by an executive order signed this year by President Trump, she also used her phone to record a video while in the boys’ locker room, which is a violation of LCPS’s own student privacy policy,” the report explained.

The report continued, “If you’re wondering what happened to the third boy, hold onto your hats: Reports indicate the Title IX investigation against him was dropped, possibly because he is Muslim. A dismissal letter sent to the boy said the complaint ‘must be dismissed from the Title IX grievance process’ because ‘the conduct alleged would not constitute sexual harassment,’ as defined by Title IX regulations, ‘even if proved.’”

And the report there have been no repercussions for the girl “who violated school policy by taking a video in a protected space.”

With the scheme, school officials have expressed their intention, too, to fight the president of the United States in his effort to secure student safety in schools – or see them lose federal funding.

Ian Prior, a Loudoun County resident and senior advisor at America First Legal, explained to RedState that the school is “doing its best to guarantee that the Supreme Court decisively ends these insane interpretations of Title IX and the equal protection clause.”

In fact, a transgender “rights” case now is pending before the court.

Questions in the case include whether Title IX prevents a state from consistently designating girls’ and boys’ sports teams based on biological sex determined at birth; and whether the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment prevents a state from offering separate boys’ and girls’ sports teams based on biological sex determined at birth.